Jack has cancer which is inoperable. there is a treatment that can prolong his life for up to 18 months but which cannot provide a cure. the procedure is very expensive and although he does have medical insurance, the insurance company is dragging its feet and will not provide authorization. their thinking is that if they can delay a decision until jack dies they can save a significant amount of money. which ethical rule drawn from the law are they most specifically violating?

so you come to the correct conclusions and make the right decision based on good judgment and a clear mind and valid thought processes behind it, and not just hasty thinking and recklessness.

explanation:

hey love i hoped this if it didn't let me know. you so much and have a wonderful day : ) keep doing the very best you can and never give up you can do it

answer: us constution

explanation:

answer: uh,crime?

explanation: cause im on probation

yeah sometimes i dont know why maybe cuhz something is bothering you