subject
Law, 15.12.2020 17:40 teamsadie8426

Wisconsin V Yoder 1972 1. In Justice Burger’s majority opinion, he makes several assumptions regarding the plaintiffs’ actions. 2. Describe Burger’s assumptions regarding the State’s responsibility for the education of its citizens. 3. What other factors does Burger claim must be considered when mandating education requirements? 4. Explain the basis of Yoder’s claim that Wisconsin’s compulsory education requirements violated their First Amendment rights.

5. Explain the Court’s reasoning as to why Wisconsin believed that it could compel school attendance in this situation.

PART II: EXPLAINING THE DECISION

6. What was the Supreme Court’s ruling in Wisconsin v. Yoder, 1972?

PART III: EXPLAINING DISSENTS AND CONCURRING OPINIONS

7. What was the primary point of Justice Douglas; dissent (in part)?

PART IV: MAKING CONNECTIONS

8. Briefly explain other Supreme Court cases concerning issues presented in Yoder.

PART V: CRAFTING AN ESSAY

9. Using your responses to the questions above, develop an essay describing the context of the case, explain the reasoning for the majority decision, explain the reasoning of concurring [and dissenting] Supreme Court decisions, and explain similarities and differences among related Supreme Court decisions and opinions.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Law

question
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
What does charged off as bad debt canceled by credit grantor mean?
Answers: 2
question
Law, 09.07.2019 11:10
Continue to drink or use other drugs and drive but be more careful
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 18:20
Asubject in a clinical research trial experiences a serious, unanticipated adverse drug experience. how should the investigator proceed, with respect to the irb, after the discovery of the adverse event occurrence? a. do not report the adverse drug experience to the irb since it is a common adverse experience. b. report the adverse drug experience to the irb only if there are several other occurrences. c. report the adverse drug experience as part of the continuing review report. d. report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner, in keeping with the irb's policies and procedures, using the forms or the mechanism provided by the irb
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 20:20
Why was the supreme court’s ruling important in gitlow v. new york?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Wisconsin V Yoder 1972 1. In Justice Burger’s majority opinion, he makes several assumptions regardi...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 27.02.2020 00:31
question
History, 27.02.2020 00:31
Questions on the website: 13722363