Priya rewrites the expression 8y - 24 as 8(y - 3). Han rewrites 8y - 24 as 2 (4y - 12). Are Priya's and Han's expressions each equivalent to 8y - 24? Explain your reasoning

They are equivalent

Step-by-step explanation:

Priya rewrites the expression 8y - 24 as 8(y - 3).

Han rewrites 8y - 24 as 2(4y - 12)

The two expressions are equivalent. This is reached by taking note of the fact that if the factorized form is expanded, they both give the same result.

In Priya's Version,

8(y - 3)=(8 X y)-(8 X 3)=8y-24

Likewise In Han's Version

2(4y - 12)=(2 X 4y) - (2 X 12) =8y-24

We can see from the bolded that our results are the same. Priya's Version is a fully factorized form while Han's Version can still be factorized further to get Priya's version.

i.e. 2(4y - 12)=2 X 4(y-3)=8(y-3)

proofs involving isosceles triangles often require special consideration because an isosceles triangle has several distinct properties that do not apply to normal triangles.(more about triangle types) therefore, when you are trying to prove that two triangles are congruent, and one or both triangles, are isosceles you have a few theorems that you can use to make your life easier.

step-by-step explanation:

an isosceles triangle has two congruent sides and two congruent angles. the congruent angles are called the base angles and the other angle is known as the vertex angle. ∠bac and ∠bca are the base angles of the triangle picture on the left. the vertex angle is ∠abc

answer: the answer is b. i think hope i got it correct

step-by-step explanation: