In the fall semester of 2009, the average Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) of the students at a certain university was 500 with a standard deviation of 90. In the fall of 2010, the average GMAT was 570 with a standard deviation of 85.5. Which year's GMAT scores show a more dispersed distribution

2009's GMAT scores show a more dispersed distribution.

Given that in 2009: Mean = 500 and standard deviation = 90.

In 2010: Mean = 570 and standard deviation = 85.5.

If the standard deviation is higher then the scores will be more dispersed.

Note that: 90 > 85.5. And 90 corresponds to 2009.

So, 2009's GMAT scores show a more dispersed distribution.

Learn more: link

Due to the higher coefficient of variation, 2009's GMAT scores show a more dispersed distribution

Step-by-step explanation:

To verify how dispersed a distribution is, we find it's coefficient of variation.

Coefficient of variation:

Mean of , standard deviation of . The coefficient is:

Which year's GMAT scores show a more dispersed distribution

Whichever year has the highest coefficient.

2009:

Mean of 500, standard deviation of 90. So

2010:

Mean of 570, standard deviation of 85.5. So

Due to the higher coefficient of variation, 2009's GMAT scores show a more dispersed distribution

step-by-step explanation:

i dont get

y < -3

step-by-step explanation:

-3y - 2 > 7

-3y -2 + 2 > 7+2

-3y > 9

-3y/-3 < 9/-3   (change the inequality sign when multiplying or dividing by a negative number)

y < -3