The correlation coefficient for blood pressure and amount of vegetables eaten in a group of people is −0.7. Analyze the following statement: High blood pressure is caused by not eating vegetables.

Is this a reasonable conclusion? (2 points)

No; blood pressure and eating vegetables are completely unrelated
No; even though there is a strong negative correlation, not eating vegetables doesn't necessarily cause high blood pressure
Yes; eating vegetables reduces blood pressure, so the opposite is also true
Yes; the correlation coefficient is below −0.5, so that implies causation

just watch memes

step-by-step explanation:

it me < 3

the answer on ed. is:

c. "the graph of f(x) has exactly two x-intercepts."

hope i could someone! : )

graph #4 (last graph) depict the function   f(x)= -m(x-d)^1/5 i

step-by-step explanation:

we know that

m=slope

but in this function slope is -m that means slope is decreasing and it is decreasing by 1/5 points down the x-axis.

which is shown in graph four

a decreasing slope down x-axis by 1/5 points.

hence 4th graph is the right option for this.

stock holders gave company a contract to lay tack to 2 to 3 times actual cost and pocketed profits

-took $23 mill in stocks