subject
Mathematics, 16.12.2020 07:30 bellc42069

Martha drew a pair of intersecting non-perpendicular lines, I and m. She numbered one pair of vertical angles <1 and <2, and she labeled the second pair of vertical angles <3 and <4. Martha made the conjecture that <1 =~ <2 to validate this conjecture, which of the following would be appropriate reasoning? A. M<1+ M<2 +M<3 + m<4 = 360

B. The sum of the measures of angles of a triangle is 180°

C. The measure of all right is 90°

D. Because <1 and <2 are each supplementary to <3, they are therefore congruent

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:20
Which function is increasing? o a. f(x)=(1/15)* o b. f(x)= (0.5)* o c. f(x)=(1/5)* o d. f(x) = 5*
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00
An investment decreases in value by 30% in the first year and decreases by 40% in the second year. what is the percent decrease in percentage in the investment after two years
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:30
Asap (i need to finish this quick) graph complete the sequence of transformations that produces △x'y'z' from △xyz. a clockwise rotation ° about the origin followed by a translation units to the right and 6 units down produces δx'y'z' from δxyz.
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:20
Which of the following is equal to the square root of the cube root of 5 ? (1 point) 5 to the power of 1 over 3 5 to the power of 1 over 6 5 to the power of 2 over 3 5 to the power of 3 over 2
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Martha drew a pair of intersecting non-perpendicular lines, I and m. She numbered one pair of vertic...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 27.06.2020 15:01
Questions on the website: 13722363