Me this introduction to addition or subtraction of fractions with different denominator 3/5+1/3 ask f the brain the brain answere haamcsaai 2 watching answer mathematics 8 pts 1 minute ago i need making an inequality. the problem is down below: the student council wants to rent a ballroom for the junior prom. the ballroom's rental plan is $1500 for 3 h and $125 for answer mathematics 5 pts 2 minutes ago what is the sum of the first eight terms -800, -200, -50, -12. etc divide by 4 each time i could do this but im too lazy : p answer mathematics 5 pts 5 minutes ago the product of two consecutive positive integers is 1,332. explain how you can write and solve a quadratic equation to find the value of the larger integer. answer mathematics 5 pts 5 minutes ago introduction to addition or subtraction of fractions with different denominator 3/5+1/3

The numbers can be written as x and x + 1. Set the product of the numbers equal to 1,332 to get x(x + 1) = 1,332. You can solve the quadratic equation by using the quadratic formula, completing the square, or factoring. When you solve the quadratic equation, you find that x = –37 and 36. Since the question asked for positive integers, the only viable solution is x = 36. To solve for the larger integer, you add 1 to 36 to get an answer of 37.

Step-by-step explanation:

Sorry if this is wrong answer I just saw this question after looking one up and copied and pasted the sample response from said question on edge2020.

50- 250 is correct i did that one too

step-by-step explanation:

so firstly, we need to isolate the y variables to be able to solve these inequalities. firstly, add 0.5x on both sides of the first inequality and subtract 1.5x on both sides of the second inequality:

now since the slope is positive for the first inequality, this means that the line going upwards belongs to the first inequality, and the line going downwards belongs to the second inequality.

next, since y ≥ in the first inequality, this means that the shaded region will be above the first inequality's line, thus shading regions a and b.

next, since y ≤ in the second inequality, this means that the shaded region is going to be below this line, thus shading regions a and c.

since both lines shade region a, this means that region a is the solution.

step-by-step explanation:

mark brainliest!