A claim put forth by some purveyors of health foods is that vitamins obtained from natural sources are more healthful than those obtained by chemical synthesis. For example, pure L-ascorbic acid (vitamin C) extracted from rose hips is better than pure L-ascorbic acid manufactured in a chemical plant. 1) Are the vitamins from the two sources different? 2) Is Synthetic Vitamin C as Good as the Natural Vitamin? 3) Can the body distinguish a vitamin’s source?

1) Are the vitamins from the two sources different? not really

2) Is Synthetic Vitamin C as Good as the Natural Vitamin? yes

3) Can the body distinguish a vitamin’s source? the difference, if any, is so insignificant that human bodies cannot distinguish them.

Explanation:

Even though synthetic vitamins are artificial (created in a lab), it doesn't mean that they are harmful. The problem is that most synthetic vitamins are not useful either.

But in some cases, like vitamin C, the effects of synthetic or natural vitamin C are virtually identical and the body will not distinguish between them. Some studies ave shown a very small and insignificant differences, but they are minimum. If you lack vitamin C in your diet, taking synthetic vitamins is a good idea.

answer:

i didn't even do anything

explanation:

answer:

explanation:

u just got rid of some points right now by putting an answer

i hope dis