The New Horizons spacecraft sent back information from Arrokoth, an object in the Kuiper Belt that is helping scientists understand the emergence of planets in our solar system. Two theories of planetary formation have been evaluated in light of evidence from Arrokoth. Scientists believe that information from Arrokoth supports the cloud collapse theory. Is this an objective and accurate summary? How do you know? A It's accurate but not objective; language describing the scientists suggests that they're relying too heavily on data from the spacecraft. B It's objective but not accurate; it attributes the wrong theory of planetary formation to Arrokoth. C It's accurate and objective; it describes the article in an unbiased manner and conveys information correctly. D It's neither accurate nor objective; it misrepresents the goal of the scientists and suggests they are not using the information in the best way.