Tannen wrote this essay in 1993. is it outdated, or is it even more relevant today? consider her thesis in light of other cultures or ethnicities or time periods. in a country where women's choices in dress are restricted by social mores, for example, is tannen's claim applicable?

I think this essay is very relatable today and I agree with all that she said. Women have no standard set. Every style, every mannerism, every article of chlothing or accessory is unique and gives off clues about what a women is like. This is less applicable in other areas where there is a rgimen that women must follow since they can not express themselves materialisticaly.

first of all, it's important to say that the book we shall not be moved, written by joan dash, is about the first strike of women in the united states in the year 1909. the best historical detail to clarify the reader's undertanding is the phrase "general strike". this strike involved women working at a garment factory who decided to protest   long working hours, low wages and brutal conditions. this strike became known as "the new york shirtwaist strike" or "the uprising of the 20,000". the strike mostly involved jewish women who did not speak english or who had a basic knowledge of the english language. finally, the strike went on from november 1909 until february 1910.

answer; primary source information;