At the end of the 20th century and at the start of the 21st century, the united states has been providing large amounts of humanitarian support to countries in africa. which of these is a reason for most of that support?

I don't know what your options were, but here are some reasons for the US to provide support to countries in Africa:

-moral reason: it's morally right to share the wealth
-humanitarian reasons: we care about other people and we don't want other people to suffer
-economic reasons: if the US provides aid to those countries, it can later invest in them too, which will be economically profitable.
-it's also generally good if other countries are also rich, as they can be a potential market for the US goods

Ithink be true but i think false

The  holy roman empire  was a feudal monarchy that encompassed present-day  germany, the  netherlands,  belgium, luxembourg,  switzerland,  austria, the czech and slovak republics, as well as parts of eastern  france, northern italy,  slovenia, and western  poland  at the start of the early modern centuries. it was created by the coronation of the frankish king  charlemagne  as roman emperor by pope leo iii on christmas day in the year 800, thus restoring in their eyes the western  roman empire  that had been leaderless since 476. charlemagne's frankish successor emperors faltered under political and military challenges, and his inheritance was permanently divided in 887. after 924 the western empire was again without an emperor until the coronation of otto i, duke of saxony, on 2 february 962. this coronation was seen to transfer the roman imperial office to the heirs of the east franks, the germans. the position of emperor remained among the germans until the holy roman empire was abolished in the aftermath of the napoleonic wars in 1806.