subject
Social Studies, 19.07.2019 18:20 chloeholt123

Case study: frederick is a student at central fictional state university (cfsu), and he has a great idea for a new business invention. frederick's invention and the business that he plans to found based on it will absolutely revolutionize the market and will make him very rich. he decides to share his idea with a few trusted professors, and he even uses the idea in a research project for one of his classes. while frederick is at home over summer break, he discovers, much to his dismay, that his professors have stolen his idea and have opened a business marketing his new invention. frederick immediately seeks the advice of the local lawyer who has a reputation for being a "scorched-earth" litigator. he advises frederick that he should sue “those professors for everything they've got." frederick, however, is not sure if he should file an aggressive lawsuit, or if there is a better way to proceed. frederick knows that your business recently completed mediation to settle a lawsuit filed by one of your suppliers. he comes to you for advice on how to proceed. what is your answer to frederick? in your response, consider whether the decision to file suit or to proceed through some form of alternative dispute resolution is affected by the previous relationship with the professors (can/should you sue a friend, how will the decision impact an ongoing relationship, also, what role could frederick’s faith play in his decision?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:00
Ineed because i cannot find the answers anywhere
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:30
What was the main motivation for the early populists
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:30
How does the author's discussion of schroeder's study contribute to the development of ideas about how children react to mistakes?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 20:00
Dr. laguardia is a cognitive neuroscientist who is interested in the effect of brain concussions on the ability to recognize faces. he conducts a quasi-experimental study in which he examines football players before and after the regular season using the benton facial recognition test (a published, widely used measure of one's ability to recognize faces) to compare those who received concussions to those who did not. he finds that players who had concussions during the regular season performed worse on the benton facial recognition test than did players who did not experience which of the following is true regarding external validity in dr.laguardia's study? a. because dr. laguardia selected participants who actually experienced concussions, the study b. because dr. laguardia's study is a quasi-experiment, it is impossible to obtain c. because dr. laguardia's dependent variable was assessed in the laboratory, the study d. because dr. laguardia selected a widely used measure, his study generalizes to has strong external validity. external validity has limited external validity. other applications of this measure.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Case study: frederick is a student at central fictional state university (cfsu), and he has a great...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 22.01.2020 02:31
question
Mathematics, 22.01.2020 02:31
Questions on the website: 13722361