In his essay "the great non-debate over international sweatshops," ian maitland argues that good ethical judgment requires that more sweatshops, not fewer, are needed.

True

Explanation:

About the debate on third-world factories, Ian Maitland defended sweatshops as a more suitable way for workers to receive better wages.

Maitland states that paying wages over market levels is what might actually be considered ethically unacceptable, and the ethical thing to do is paying market wages. The logic behind this statement is that companies might relocate somewhere else if minimum wage standards apply.

c: in the east might be the correct answer