Victoria is a human resource specialist. to gain competency in her field, she keeps up with business news related to human resource management. one area of the news she pays attention to is coverage of the cases the supreme court hears each year. why would stories about the supreme court be relevant for victoria's career?
a. the supreme court may require federal contractors to engage in affirmative action.
b. the supreme court may issue executive orders related to employee safety. the supreme court may issue rulings that interpret employment law.
c. the supreme court may pass laws regulating employment practices.
d. decisions made by the supreme court cannot be overturned by the federal government.

b. The Supreme Court may issue executive orders related to employee safety. The Supreme Court may issue rulings that interpret employment law.

Explanation:

The supreme court may issue executive orders related to employee safety and as a human resource expert she should know those executive orders and be upto date, as well as the supreme court may issue rulings interpreting the employment law that she must and need to be conscient of, because that is important for her job position. If the supreme court re-interpretates an employment law she should know the new interpretation to let her boss know how they ruling has changed and what changes they need to do to be up-to date with the new rulings.

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.

imagine me knowing the answer