People especially likely to comply with soft power tactics tend to . have low self-esteem be more focused on getting along with others than with getting their own way be more action oriented have greater desire for control be extrinsically motivated

Have greater desire for control

Explanation:

Soft power is the capability of getting what you want through attraction instead of coercion. This is often in contrast to hard power which uses coercion (example threat) to get what they want. Soft power is a way of using persuasive power to attract people, influence their behaviors and get them to give you outcomes that what you want without coercion. Therefore people complying with soft power tactics tend have greater desire for control and they achieve this power through attraction and not coercion.

Be more focused on getting along with others than with getting their own way.

Explanation:

Soft power as opposed to hard power involves persuasion and does not involve difficult "either", 'or" options. Soft power does not force opinions and authority over subordinates.

Soft power involves leading by example and attracting others to do what is wanted by the leader by being the pacesetter.

Soft power fosters, willing togetherness between leaders and followers as leaders who use this, can affect the behaviors of followers or subordinates without having to command it.

People who mostly comply with soft power tactics, place more importance on being on good terms or getting along with people they work with, rather than getting their own way. This attribute, makes them evade confrontation and conflict but achieves unity through soft dialogue mostly, agreeing upon mutual ideas and methods for tackling a situation.

is there answer choices?