Social Studies, 07.05.2020 14:58 dion27

WILL MARK BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT 20 POINTS

Terrance lives in Iraq. He exports fine Persian rugs to the United States. Iraq's currency, the dinar, has recently lost value compared to the dollar. Which statement explains how this change in currency value would affect Terrance's business?

Sales of the rugs would likely decrease. U. S. buyers will get fewer dinars for each dollar.

Sales of the rugs would likely increase. U. S. buyers will get more dinars for each dollar.

Sales of the rugs would likely decrease. U. S. buyers will get more dinars for each dollar.

Sales of the rugs would likely increase. U. S. buyers will get fewer dinars for each dollar.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: o10922025

Sales of the rugs would likely increase. U.S. buyers will get more dinars for each dollar. I don't know absolutely if this is correct or not, but i think it is..

Answer from: Quest

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write

explanation:

Answer from: Quest

to stay where they were until m sent for

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:30

The decision states that legislation cannot overcome social prejudice. can it reinforce social prejudice? how?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:50

In e. c. tolman's experiment, some rats were trained to run through mazes for standard food goals, while other rats were allowed to explore the mazes for 10 days without food goals or other rewards. later, when food rewards were placed in a box at the far end of the maze, the previously unrewarded rats reached the food box as quickly as the rewarded rats after only one or two trials. this experiment demonstrated that the rats had the ability to form of their surroundings.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00

Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 15:30

Which of the following best describes elizabeth cady stanton and susan b. anthony? o two women who formed the national woman suffrage association o the first two american women to hold national elected office o two women who formed the american abortionist movement the first two american women to vote legally in a national election

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

WILL MARK BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT 20 POINTS

Terrance lives in Iraq. He exports fine Persia...

Questions