100 points and brainiliest Really need help

Explain the Iron Curtain in your own words.

Where was the Iron Curtain located?

Why were photographs showing negative aspects of socialist rule never released during the time period they were taken?

Looks through the photos in the slide show. Name 2-3 emotions you feel when looking at the images.

When and where did the first EEC meeting take place?

What overall goals did the EEC have?

What was promised in the Civil Rights Act of 1964?

How were Malcom X and Martin Luther King, Jr. different in their approaches to equal rights?

How did the Civil Rights Movement aid the 1960s Women’s Rights Movement?

What did Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 do?

Which number identifies the guyot? a. 1 b. 2 c. 3 d. 4 e. 5 f. 6

The pka of three different c―h bonds is given below. explain the observed trend in pka. select the single best answer.

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.