The game "Mountain Adventure” is a huge hit. Kids can choose to play as different avatars, such as Liam, a red-haired teenage boy; Calvin, a Black teenage boy; and Quinn, a Chinese American teenage boy. A group of girls, including Clara, writes an email to the game’s developers, reminding them that girls like to play the game too. The developers create the avatar of Hannah, a blond teenage girl. Clara is disappointed that they did not show intersectionality in their decision. What does that mean? The video game company should have written back to the girls to get their input about adding new avatars. The game developers listened to the complaint in the email and made a change to the game that was unnecessary. The male characters are of several races, but there is no representation of female characters of different racial identities. The game will not look as interesting when there are different male avatars on the screen but a bunch of female avatars that look like one another.

If morality represents the way we would like the world to work and economics represents how it actually does work, then the story of feldman’s bagel business lies at the very intersection of morality and economics. yes, a lot of people steal from him, but the vast majority, even though no is watching over them, do not. this outcome may surprise some people—including feldman’s economist friends, who counseled him twenty years ago that his honor-system scheme would never work. but it would not have surprised adam smith. in fact, theme of smith’s first book, the theory of moral sentiments, was the innate honesty of mankind. “how selfish soever man may be supposed,” smith wrote, “there are evidently some principles in his nature which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it, except the pleasure of seeing it.” which best describes the authors’ purpose in using a quotation from adam smith’s book the theory of moral sentiments? to highlight their knowledge of scottish philosophers to prove that people are inherently dishonest to demonstrate that incentive is the driving force behind cheating to lend credibility and additional support to their conclusion