subject
Social Studies, 24.11.2021 20:20 jess7kids

In a study measuring delayed gratification, 7-year-old Mary is given the opportunity to eat one marshmallow now, or wait 10 minutes and then she will receive two marshmallows. Mary chooses to wait 10 minutes to receive the greater reward, and then is able to follow through on her choice. Given no other information, this ability to delay gratification predicts all of the following EXCEPT that Mary will compared with those children who could not delay gratification.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:40
Explain why the judicial branch is considered the weakest branch. explain what might happen if the judicial branch could not separate itself from the other two branches. explain how a strong judiciary branch would maintain limited government and individual rights. explain why a law that contradicts the constitution must be ruled invalid. explain why the legislature may not determine if its laws are unconstitutional. hamilton argues that the judicial branch is not above the legislative branch. explain his reasoning. how is the problem solved when two laws passed by the same legislature contradict each other? explain why hamilton believes it is pointless to argue the power of judicial review will enable judges to rule in ways that serve their own interests. explain how life tenure is necessary for the judicial branch to be able to protect individual rights against a majority. explain how everyone benefits when the rights of individuals or groups are protected. explain how limited terms of office might discourage the best-qualified people.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:30
Give a brief summary/define the holocaust - who was behind it, how it began, what was the goal, and where did it take place? (8-10 sentences). be sure to include at least 2 pictures or a timeline
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30
Occurs with the fully informed request of a competant adult patient or their surrogate. culture of life: select the best answer from the choices provided. a. voluntary euthanasia b. nonvoluntary euthanasia c. involuntary euthanasia d. passive euthanasia
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In a study measuring delayed gratification, 7-year-old Mary is given the opportunity to eat one mars...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 15.12.2020 01:40
question
Mathematics, 15.12.2020 01:40
question
Mathematics, 15.12.2020 01:40
question
Mathematics, 15.12.2020 01:40
question
Mathematics, 15.12.2020 01:40
question
Mathematics, 15.12.2020 01:40
question
Mathematics, 15.12.2020 01:40
question
Mathematics, 15.12.2020 01:40
Questions on the website: 13722367