What are 3 of the factors that made the war difficult for South Vietnam and the US troops?

Morale, Terrain, Traps, Weaponry and flashbacks .

Explanation: Morale is a important factor in any army. So at the start of the war most of our solders thought it would be amazing to fight in a war. While the South at the being was already lone on the morale specially after the 1963 rebellion. Than later in the war our morale was low because of the drafts, and anti-war movement. Than the Terrain was bad. The jungles were full of North Vietnam troops. And if they were well hidden they can cause heavy loses to our troops. Traps like bamboo spikes, snake traps. And the tunnels were full of traps. Like made in a way to flood when US troops would be in their looking for enemy. Weaponry. Since a nice amount of the combat happened in areas were tanks could not travel since in the past few wars we used tanks a lots. And Vets and people deployed would suffer from flashback and would often get flashback from combat,and if the terrain in Vietnam was the same in the States it could give them flashback.These are factors that made the war difficult for South Vietnam and the US troops.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

add the answer choices and i'll give you the answer