How did cardinal bellarmine respond to the following arguments from galileo?

The arguments that Galileo put forward to Cardinal Bellarmine were:

a. The bible passages about the sun still should not have been interpreted literally.

b. The model of the universe (heliocentric or geocentric) is not matter of salvation.

The Cardinal responded to statement "a" by saying that Galileo did not have the authority to decide which Bible passages were meant to be taken literally and which ones were not. He then responded to statement "b" by saying that, similarly, it was not up to Galileo to decide what was a matter of salvation and what was not. This authority belonged only to the Church.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.