Read the scenario below and answer the question that follows. pierce is driving home. he notices a driver swerving dangerously around the road. he also notices that the driver is a teenager. this is the second teenaged driver that pierce has noticed driving erratically in the last three months. pierce believes that teen drivers are the worst drivers. based on the vivid cases cognitive bias, why does pierce believe that teenaged drivers are particularly poor drivers? a. pierce has read many scenarios about how teens are poor drivers. b. pierce is more easily able to recall experiences with poor teen drivers. c. pierce has a prejudice against teenagers in general because of his own youth. d. pierce is blaming the small group of teen drivers for everyone’s bad driving.

Was “labor violence” inevitable and unavoidable? what factors played into causing much of the confrontation between unions and big buisness

Which of the following events most directly contributed to the establishment of israel as a nation

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.