Scientific consensus supports the idea that living organisms require oxygen. then, a scientist discovers a type of bacteria that metabolizes sulfur instead of oxygen, and thus survives in environments without oxygen. the scientist concludes that a diverse group of many different organisms could live in an oxygen-free environment. why should are some scientists skeptical of the scientist’s results and conclusion?

the conclusion shows the scientist is not open-minded.

the results will be difficult for scientists to reproduce.

the conclusion needs to be supported by more evidence

! i'm being !

transformative rocks are the stones that emerge from the transformation of existing rock composes in a procedure called changeability, implies changing of structures. transformative rocks are shaped from alternate shakes that are changing a result of warmth or weight connected. one of this model is the earth developments that making rocks profoundly cover or crushed which will make the stones warmed and put under awesome weight. they are not softening but rather the minerals they are containing are changed synthetically that will shape transformative rocks. now and again different rocks are shaped when the others are near some liquid magma and getting warmed.