English, 02.10.2019 17:20 CamFootball638

Need -winning author sonia nazario is best known for her pulitzer prize–winning biography enrique’s journey. the book brings to life the very real and dangerous journey of a honduran boy fleeing his home in hopes of finding his mother in america. in addition to the biography, nazario has written countless articles informing readers of the dangers children like enrique face. while the biography and the articles serve the same purpose and present the same ideas, they do so in different ways. you will be comparing and contrasting how nazario informs her audience through a biography and an editorial. you may access the editorial here and the biography here. write a comparative essay in which you compare and contrast the way sonia nazario presents similar ideas in a biography and an editorial. support your comparison with well-chosen, relevant, and sufficient evidence from both texts. apply mla guidelines to properly cite the evidence used in your essay. be sure your essay uses formal and objective language. brainliest to whoever can answer this with an actual good essay

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 16:20

Parla you studied both a video analysis and text analysis of the poem "i hear america singing." consider how the speaker of the poem describes america as "singing. nrite a paragraph discussing the central theme of the poem, drawing information from both the video and the text. cite specific evidence from the video and text to support analysis

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 21.06.2019 20:10

Read the passage below and answer the question, dill was a curiosity. in the excerpt above, the word "curiosity" suggests that dill is odd dill asks a lot of questions dill is hard to understand dill is lost

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 01:00

What is darrow’s main argument and the claims he makes in this excerpt? a. darrow argues that even if the boys are horrible monsters, their deaths will not solve the problems of society; he claims that society wants the boys to be executed because people enjoy watching public executions. b. he argues that the people who should be held responsible for the crime are leopold’s and loeb’s parents since they neglected their sons; he claims that leopold and loeb were jealous of the boy they killed because he had expensive belongings they could not afford. c. darrow argues that the boys should not face the death penalty; he claims they both suffer from mental illnesses that make them unable to tell the difference between a dream and reality. d. he argues that leopold and loeb, particularly dickie loeb, should not be executed; he claims they were teenagers who didn’t have proper adult guidance, so they are not responsible for what they did.

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 02:30

Make a list of 5 things you need and 5 things that you want

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Need -winning author sonia nazario is best known for her pulitzer prize–winning biography enrique’s...

Questions

English, 09.11.2020 23:20

What information does DNA provide to all of the cells organelles...