Do you think celebrating Black History month is a sufficiently positive step in beginning to replace Black Americans in American history, or that it does not do enough ? Or is there a better way to do it?

No, all it does is set the races apart even more. There should be no black history month. If you want to "move foward" or whatever the woke agenda calls it then you should stop talking about race completely. If a person in history did something they should not be recognized for their race but for who they were and what they did.

disease was the number one killer of native peoples. they had had little exposure to the diseases of europe. this led to some villages being almost completely wiped out and some tribes destroyed.

        i'm fairly sure that the correct answers are 2 and 3.

        i used both my knowledge of world history and the process of elimination to obtain these answers. option 1 cannot be a possible selection because the mandate of heaven belongs to ancient chinese philosophical belief. option 4 sounds like it would benefit the region than detriment it. however, both 2 and 3 explain a potential reason for what could have contributed to the fall of the roman empire.

      hope this ! if i were you, i'd get a second opinion, because i haven't taken this course for a year. best of luck!

***websites that me understand the curriculum better last year are and ***