9/11 How do paragraphs 26-28 contribute to the development of ideas in the text? Para. 26 - 28:
In the wake of the attacks, one thing that exemplified the best qualities of America was a call from many Americans for religious tolerance in the face of rising prejudice and Islamophobia. One week after 9/11, President Bush called on the Islamic Center in Washington, D. C., and assured the gathering that the United States knows the difference between terrorists and good citizens.

“America counts millions of Muslims amongst our citizens,” he said, “and Muslims make an incredibly valuable contribution to our country. [They] are doctors, lawyers, law professors, members of the military, entrepreneurs, shopkeepers, moms and dads. And they need to be treated with respect. In our anger and emotion, our fellow Americans must treat each other with respect.”

The feeling is still seen today. As the sister of one of the victims of 9/11 attack wrote in The Washington Post, a “murderous act does not justify discrimination against people based on race, religion or nationality. It does not justify banning refugees and immigrants. These cruel actions may not be done in my name, or in the name of my dead brother.”

question is unclear.

i can't sorry.

post the full question so i can .

presidency should be the title

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!